 |
| Top 3 Camera Phones Under ₹50,000 |
If you're searching for an excellent camera phone but don't want to spend upwards of 70,000-80,000 rupees for a flagship experience, you've come to the right place. I have some great options under 50,000 rupees lined up for you: the new Vivo V40 Pro, the Xiaomi 14 CV with Leica, and the Motorola H50 Ultra with Pantone. By the end of this comparison, you'll know which of these three camera phones takes the best pictures and which one suits you best.
Specifications
Let’s start with the specifications:
- 50MP primary camera
- 50MP ultra-wide camera
- 50MP 2x portrait camera
- 50MP selfie camera
- 50MP primary camera
- 12MP ultra-wide camera
- 50MP 2x portrait camera
- 32MP pair of selfie cameras
- 50MP primary camera
- 12MP ultra-wide camera
- 64MP 3x optical zoom camera
- 60MP selfie camera
Camera Performance
Detail and Clarity
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features the largest sensor among the three, capturing the most detailed images with sharper textures. The Vivo V40 Pro follows with good detail, and the Xiaomi 14 CV is third in terms of detail.
HDR Performance
In HDR processing, the Vivo V40 Pro's multi-stack processing struggles with shadow lifting, resulting in darker images. The Xiaomi 14 CV brightens the image but sometimes overblows the highlights. Motorola's HDR tuning achieves the best balance, managing shadows and highlights effectively.
Color Accuracy
Motorola excels in color capture with accurate representation of reds, greens, and blues. The Vivo V40 Pro's natural mode is a close second, while Xiaomi's colors are inconsistent, especially in the Leica modes.
Low-Light Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra performs best in low light, capturing the most details and sharpest textures due to its large sensor. The Vivo V40 Pro is a solid second choice, particularly in extreme low light. Xiaomi lags behind, with its scene reproduction not as refined as the other two.
Portrait Mode
For 24mm portraits, Motorola accurately captures skin tones, followed by Vivo and then Xiaomi. In 35mm and 50mm portraits, both Motorola and Vivo offer excellent results, with Vivo providing more detail. Motorola excels in 85mm portraits but has a pale yellow skin tone issue in specific situations. Vivo's 100mm portraits are commendable.
Zoom Performance
At 2x zoom, Xiaomi and Vivo outperform Motorola, with Xiaomi showing sharper textures at 3x zoom. At 4x and 6x, Motorola captures more details and better textures, which is surprising given the expectations.
Selfie Cameras
Xiaomi's selfie camera has an advantage with accurate skin tones and slightly more detail compared to Motorola and Vivo. In selfie portraits, Motorola excels in edge detection, while Vivo and Xiaomi miss some details. For low-light selfies, Motorola performs best, with better detail and color accuracy than Xiaomi and Vivo.
Video Recording
4K Video Recording
Vivo shoots 4K at 60 FPS but lacks stabilization. Motorola and Xiaomi offer better stabilization and audio quality. Between the two, Motorola has superior stabilization, but Xiaomi's HDR is better. In low-light video recording, Motorola is the best, with Xiaomi second and Vivo third.
Selfie Video Recording
Vivo offers 4K 60 FPS video recording using the selfie camera with excellent quality, especially in skin tones and details. Xiaomi's 4K 30 FPS selfie videos are better than Motorola's. Motorola’s selfie video recording falls short compared to its competitors.
Also read: Best Phone Under 40000 Rs (2024): No More Confusion!
Conclusion
Overall, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra stands out as the best camera phone under 50,000 rupees, even surpassing the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra on DxOMark. The Vivo V40 Pro is the second-best with its impressive features and playful camera modes. The Xiaomi 14 CV ranks third, with some strengths but also noticeable shortcomings.
What do you think of this comparison? Did the results align with your expectations? Let me know in the comments below!
Comments
Post a Comment